EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

+2.4

11 of 13 Colorado Rockies hitters facing Matt Waldron have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.3 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Matt Waldron and Nationals Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Wednesday, August 26, 2026

11 of 13 Colorado Rockies hitters facing Matt Waldron have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.3 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Matt Waldron and Nationals Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
822692
matchup
Colorado Rockies vs Washington Nationals
venue
Nationals Park
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
663362
pitcher name
Matt Waldron
throws
R
lineup team
Colorado Rockies
hitters evaluated
13
lineup lean
0.4
context lean
2
total lean
2.4
power lean
0.3
contact lean
0.1
favoring
11
against
0
direction
lineup
headline
+2.4
detail
11 of 13 Colorado Rockies hitters facing Matt Waldron have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.3 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Matt Waldron and Nationals Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.