EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

-3

0 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Sean Newcomb have more signals for them than against, 14 more against, averaging 0 a hitter — 0 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Sean Newcomb and Busch Stadium add -3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Saturday, September 12, 2026

0 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Sean Newcomb have more signals for them than against, 14 more against, averaging 0 a hitter — 0 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Sean Newcomb and Busch Stadium add -3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
823009
matchup
Chicago White Sox vs St. Louis Cardinals
venue
Busch Stadium
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
656794
pitcher name
Sean Newcomb
throws
L
lineup team
St. Louis Cardinals
hitters evaluated
14
lineup lean
0
context lean
-3
total lean
-3
power lean
0
contact lean
0.1
favoring
0
against
14
direction
pitcher
headline
-3
detail
0 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Sean Newcomb have more signals for them than against, 14 more against, averaging 0 a hitter — 0 on the power signals and +0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Sean Newcomb and Busch Stadium add -3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.