EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

-1.5

1 of 14 San Diego Padres hitters facing Carlos Rodón have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging -0.5 a hitter — -0.4 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Carlos Rodón and Petco Park add -1 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Saturday, September 5, 2026

1 of 14 San Diego Padres hitters facing Carlos Rodón have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging -0.5 a hitter — -0.4 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Carlos Rodón and Petco Park add -1 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
823257
matchup
New York Yankees vs San Diego Padres
venue
Petco Park
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
607074
pitcher name
Carlos Rodón
throws
L
lineup team
San Diego Padres
hitters evaluated
14
lineup lean
-0.5
context lean
-1
total lean
-1.5
power lean
-0.4
contact lean
-0.1
favoring
1
against
11
direction
pitcher
headline
-1.5
detail
1 of 14 San Diego Padres hitters facing Carlos Rodón have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging -0.5 a hitter — -0.4 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Carlos Rodón and Petco Park add -1 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.