EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

+1.6

10 of 13 San Diego Padres hitters facing Connor Prielipp have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.4 a hitter — -0.3 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Connor Prielipp and Petco Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Friday, August 21, 2026

10 of 13 San Diego Padres hitters facing Connor Prielipp have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.4 a hitter — -0.3 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Connor Prielipp and Petco Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
823262
matchup
Minnesota Twins vs San Diego Padres
venue
Petco Park
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
687570
pitcher name
Connor Prielipp
throws
L
lineup team
San Diego Padres
hitters evaluated
13
lineup lean
-0.4
context lean
2
total lean
1.6
power lean
-0.3
contact lean
0
favoring
10
against
0
direction
lineup
headline
+1.6
detail
10 of 13 San Diego Padres hitters facing Connor Prielipp have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.4 a hitter — -0.3 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Connor Prielipp and Petco Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.