EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

+2.9

13 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Tanner Gordon have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.1 a hitter — -0.1 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Tanner Gordon and Coors Field add +3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Sunday, September 6, 2026

13 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Tanner Gordon have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.1 a hitter — -0.1 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Tanner Gordon and Coors Field add +3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
824309
matchup
St. Louis Cardinals vs Colorado Rockies
venue
Coors Field
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
685299
pitcher name
Tanner Gordon
throws
R
lineup team
St. Louis Cardinals
hitters evaluated
14
lineup lean
-0.1
context lean
3
total lean
2.9
power lean
-0.1
contact lean
0
favoring
13
against
0
direction
lineup
headline
+2.9
detail
13 of 14 St. Louis Cardinals hitters facing Tanner Gordon have more signals for them than against, averaging -0.1 a hitter — -0.1 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Tanner Gordon and Coors Field add +3 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.