EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

+2.4

13 of 14 Los Angeles Dodgers hitters facing Nick Lodolo have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Nick Lodolo and Great American Ball Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Monday, September 14, 2026

13 of 14 Los Angeles Dodgers hitters facing Nick Lodolo have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Nick Lodolo and Great American Ball Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
824465
matchup
Los Angeles Dodgers vs Cincinnati Reds
venue
Great American Ball Park
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
666157
pitcher name
Nick Lodolo
throws
L
lineup team
Los Angeles Dodgers
hitters evaluated
14
lineup lean
0.4
context lean
2
total lean
2.4
power lean
0.2
contact lean
0
favoring
13
against
0
direction
lineup
headline
+2.4
detail
13 of 14 Los Angeles Dodgers hitters facing Nick Lodolo have more signals for them than against, averaging +0.4 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and 0 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Nick Lodolo and Great American Ball Park add +2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.