EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

-1.9

1 of 13 Chicago White Sox hitters facing Jacob deGrom have more signals for them than against, 10 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Jacob deGrom and Rate Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Tuesday, August 25, 2026

1 of 13 Chicago White Sox hitters facing Jacob deGrom have more signals for them than against, 10 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Jacob deGrom and Rate Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
824556
matchup
Texas Rangers vs Chicago White Sox
venue
Rate Field
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
594798
pitcher name
Jacob deGrom
throws
R
lineup team
Chicago White Sox
hitters evaluated
13
lineup lean
0.1
context lean
-2
total lean
-1.9
power lean
0.2
contact lean
-0.1
favoring
1
against
10
direction
pitcher
headline
-1.9
detail
1 of 13 Chicago White Sox hitters facing Jacob deGrom have more signals for them than against, 10 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.2 on the power signals and -0.1 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward damage than base hits. Jacob deGrom and Rate Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.