EDGEAI

MLBmatchup dossier matchup dossier

-1.9

1 of 13 Milwaukee Brewers hitters facing Clay Holmes have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.1 on the power signals and +0.3 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Clay Holmes and Wrigley Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

Published Monday, August 31, 2026

1 of 13 Milwaukee Brewers hitters facing Clay Holmes have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.1 on the power signals and +0.3 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Clay Holmes and Wrigley Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

THE NUMBERS

angle
matchup_dossier
game pk
824635
matchup
Milwaukee Brewers vs Chicago Cubs
venue
Wrigley Field
lineups posted
false
pitcher id
605280
pitcher name
Clay Holmes
throws
R
lineup team
Milwaukee Brewers
hitters evaluated
13
lineup lean
0.1
context lean
-2
total lean
-1.9
power lean
0.1
contact lean
0.3
favoring
1
against
11
direction
pitcher
headline
-1.9
detail
1 of 13 Milwaukee Brewers hitters facing Clay Holmes have more signals for them than against, 11 more against, averaging +0.1 a hitter — +0.1 on the power signals and +0.3 on the contact signals, so this leans more toward base hits than damage. Clay Holmes and Wrigley Field add -2 on top, counted once for the whole lineup rather than once per hitter. Tonight's lineup is not posted yet, so this covers the full roster rather than the starting nine. This counts how many independent signals agree — it is not a probability and has not been graded against results.

This record was written when the finding was first published and has not been edited since. The numbers and the wording are what our engines produced on the day.